Adherencia a las recomendaciones de prevención de la sepsis neonatal temprana asociada a la colonización por Streptococcus agalactiae en una institución de referencia en Bogotá, Colombia, 2019 / Adherence to recommendations for preventing early neonatal sepsis associated with Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in a referral center in Bogotá, Colombia, 2019

RESUMEN Objetivos: Evaluar la adherencia a las recomendaciones de tamización para la prevención de la sepsis neonatal, describir la prevalencia de colonización por estreptococo del grupo B y los desenlaces perinatales asociados a la colonización por esta bacteria. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectiva que incluyó gestantes a término y sus recién nacidos, en una clínica universitaria privada de alta complejidad en Bogotá, entre el 1 de julio y el 31 de diciembre de 2019. Se evaluó la adherencia a la tamización y a la profilaxis antibiótica intraparto para las gestantes colonizadas con EGB, la prevalencia de colonización y los desenlaces perinatales adversos tempranos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1.928 mujeres. La adherencia a la tamización fue de 68,0 % (IC 95 %: 66-70,1), a la administración de antibióticos intraparto de 87,9 % (IC 95 %: 87,8 -88), pero hubo uso no indicado de antibióticos en 14,7 % de mujeres para una adherencia final a profilaxis antibiótica de 86,3 %. La prevalencia de colonización por EGB fue 12,5 % (IC 95 %: 10,7-14,3), la incidencia de hospitalización neonatal fue de 27,5 % (IC 95 %: 16,3-33,7); no hubo casos de mortalidad ni sepsis neonatal temprana atribuibles al estado de tamización, colonización o profilaxis antibiótica para EGB. Conclusiones: Se requieren nuevos estudios en otras instituciones para determinar la adherencia a esta guía, en especial en aquellas regiones que atienden usuarias adscritas al régimen subsidiado, con cobertura a la población más vulnerable, así como nuevos estudios poblacionales de prevalencia de EGB y costo-efectividad de la estrategia de tamización universal en comparación con la profilaxis antibiótica basada en factores de riesgo.

ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess adherence to screening recommendations for the prevention of neonatal sepsis, and describe the prevalence of colonization by Group B streptococcus (GBS) as well as the perinatal outcomes associated with colonization by this bacterium. Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study that included pregnant women at term and their newborns, seen at a private high-complexity clinic in Bogota, between July 1 and December 31, 2019. Adherence to screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in pregnant women colonized with group B streptococcus, as well as the prevalence of colonization and early adverse perinatal outcomes were assessed. Results: Overall, 1928 women were included. Adherence to screening was 68.0 % (95 % CI: 66-70.1) and 87.9 % to intrapartum antibiotic administration (95 % CI: 87.8-88); non-indicated use of antibiotics occurred in 14.7 % of the women, for 86.3 % final adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis. The prevalence of GBS colonization was 12.5 % (95 % CI: 10.7-14.3); the incidence of neonatal hospitalization was 27.5 % (95 % CI: 16.3-33.7). There were no cases of mortality or early neonatal sepsis attributable to screening status, colonization or prophylactic antibiotics for GBS. Conclusions: Additional studies in other centers are required in order to determine adherence to this guideline, particularly in those that receive users affiliated to the subsidized regime which covers the most vulnerable population. Also, new population studies of GBS prevalence and cost-effectiveness of universal screening compared to risk factor-based antibiotic prophylaxis are needed.

Effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis of group B streptococcus infection on the incidence and bacteriological profile of early-onset neonatal sepsis / 中国当代儿科杂志

OBJECTIVES@#To study the effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection on the incidence and bacteriological profile of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS).@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 494 pregnant women with positive GBS screening results and 526 neonates born by these women. According to whether the pregnant woman received IAP, the neonates were divided into two groups: IAP (n=304) and control (n=222). The two groups were compared in terms of clinical indices, incidence rate of EONS, and distribution of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture.@*RESULTS@#Compared with the control group, the IAP group had a significantly lower proportion of children with abnormal clinical manifestations (P<0.001) and a significantly lower incidence rate of EONS (P=0.022). In the IAP group, Escherichia coli (2.3%) was the most common type of pathogenic bacteria in blood culture of the neonates with EONS, while GBS (3.2%) was the most common type of pathogenic bacteria in the control group. The IAP group had a significantly higher detection rate of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli than the control group (P=0.029).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Although IAP can significantly reduce the incidence rate of EONS in neonates born to pregnant women with positive GBS screening results, the infection rate of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli may increase after IAP treatment. Therefore, it is needed to enhance the monitoring of blood culture results of neonates with EONS and timely adjust treatment plan according to drug susceptibility test results.

Asociación entre la concentración de vitamina D y la sepsis neonatal extrahospitalaria de aparición tardía / Association between vitamin D level and community-acquired late-onset neonatal sepsis

Introducción. El objetivo fue determinar la relación entre la concentración materna e infantil de vitamina D y la sepsis de aparición tardía. Población y métodos. En este estudio se incluyó a los bebés nacidos con ≥ 37 semanas de gestación hospitalizados con diagnóstico de sepsis de aparición tardía. Se comparó la concentración de vitamina D de los niños y sus madres del grupo del estudio y del de referencia. Resultados. El grupo del estudio incluyó a 46 pacientes con sepsis de aparición tardía nacidos a término y el grupo de referencia, 46 pacientes con hiperbilirrubinemia. La suplementación con vitamina D durante el embarazo fue menor en las madres del grupo del estudio que en el de referencia (p = 0,001). La concentración sérica de 25-hidroxivitamina D [25(OH)D] de los niños y las madres del grupo del estudio fue significativamente menor que la del grupo de referencia (p < 0,001). Se observó una correlación positiva entre la 25(OH)D en las madres y los niños de ambos grupos (r: 0,38; p < 0,001). El valor de corte para la 25(OH)D, que determina el riesgo de sepsis neonatal de aparición tardía, se estableció en 15,45 ng/ml (sensibilidad: 91,3 %; especificidad: 71,7 %; área bajo la curva: 0,824; p < 0,001). Conclusiones. La concentración de 25(OH)D fue inferior en los bebés nacidos a término con sepsis de aparición tardía y sus madres en comparación con el grupo de referencia. La correlación entre la concentración sérica de 25(OH)D de los niños y sus madres fue positiva.

Introduction. The objective was to determine the relationship between mother and infant vitamin D levels and late onset sepsis. Population and methods.Infants born ≥37 weeks of gestational age who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of late-onset sepsis were enrolled to this prospective case control study. VitaminD levels of the infants and their mothers in the study and a control group were compared. Results. Fourty six term patients with lateonset sepsis composed the study group, 46 patients with hyperbilirubinemia as the control group. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was lower in mothers of study group compared to the control group (p = 0.001). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of infants and mothers in the study group were significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between 25-hydroxyvitaminD levels of mothers and infants in both groups (r: 0.38, p < 0.001). The best cut off value of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which determines the risk of late-onset sepsis in neonates, was detected as 15.45 ng/ml (sensitivity: 91.3 %, specificity: 71.7 %, area under the curve: 0.824, p < 0.001). Conclusions.In this study, 25-hydroxyvitaminD levels were found to be lower in term infants with late-onset sepsis and among their mothers compared to the control group. Positive correlation was found between serum 25(OH)D levels of infants and their mothers. Key words: newborn infant, sepsis,

En mujeres embarazadas con rotura prematura de membranas y edad gestacional entre 34 y 37 semanas: ¿Es la interrupción del embarazo (manejo activo) mejor que el manejo expectante para reducir la sepsis neonatal? / In pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes and gestational age between 34 and 37 weeks: Is termination of pregnancy (active management) better than expectant management to reduce neonatal sepsis?

INTRODUCCIÓN: La rotura prematura de membranas (RPM) ocurre en un 8 a 10% de las embarazadas, y de ellas, un 20% corresponde a embarazos de pretérmino. El mayor riesgo para el feto luego de una RPM pretérmino son las complicaciones propias de la prematurez. Por debajo de las 34 semanas se favorece el manejo expectante, y el uso de antibióticos y corticoides. Entre las 34 y 37 semanas, sin embargo, las prácticas varían, no habiendo un consenso claro sobre la conducta óptima. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de esta revisión es explorar la evidencia actualmente disponible respecto de la conducta activa versus la expectante en embarazos con RPM entre las 34 y 37 semanas (36 semanas más 6 días). METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda de literatura médica en distintas bases de datos, dentro de las cuales se incluye "PubMed" y "Cochrane", usando los siguientes términos: "Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture", "Premature Birth", "34 and 37 weeks" y "Clinical Trial". Se limitó la búsqueda a artículos que fueran ensayos clínicos aleatorizados. De un total de 31 trabajos, se seleccionaron 3, a los cuales se les aplicó la pauta de análisis crítico para evaluación de estudios de terapia. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 3 estudios que respondían a la pregunta planteada. En el primer estudio se concluyó que en pacientes en que hay interrupción inmediata la incidencia de sepsis neonatal es baja y no es posible demostrar que esta conducta mejore los resultados en comparación con el manejo expectante (2.6% vs. 4.1%). El manejo activo en este estudio se asoció a mayor incidencia de hiperbilirrubinemia, hipoglicemia, y mayor estadía hospitalaria neonatal. En el segundo artículo se planteó que la incidencia de sepsis neonatal sigue siendo baja, lo cual no disminuyó con la inducción del trabajo de parto. Esta tampoco disminuyó el riesgo de otros resultados neonatales o maternos. Finalmente, el tercer estudio concluyó que la interrupción inmediata aumenta las complicaciones neonatales sin disminución de la sepsis neonatal, pero a expensas de mayor frecuencia de fiebre materna y de hemorragia intraparto. CONCLUSIONES: El manejo expectante no es inferior al manejo activo en el contexto de RPM entre las semanas 34 a 37 de edad gestacional.

INTRODUCTION: Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) occur in eight to ten percent of pregnancies, and 20 percent of them occur in preterm pregnancies. Biggest fetal risks after preterm PROM are complications due to prematurity. Before 34 weeks of gestation it is preferred an expectant management, and the use of antibiotics and steroids. Between 34 and 37 weeks, however, practices are variable without a clear consensus about the best management. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to explore the available evidence about active versus expectant management in pregnancies with PROM between 34 and 37 weeks (36 weeks plus 6 days). METHODS: Different databases were searched for medical literature, including 'PubMed' and 'Cochrane', using the following terms: 'Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture', 'Premature Birth', '34 and 37 weeks' and 'Clinical Trial'. The search was limited to clinical randomized trials. From a total of 31 studies, three were selected, in which critical analysis guidelines for evaluation of therapy studies were applied. RESULTS: Three clinical trials which answered our question were included in this review. The first study concluded that in patients whose pregnancies were interrupted immediately, the incidence of neonatal sepsis was low but is was not able to demonstrate that this action improved outcomes compared to expectant management (2.6% vs 4.1%). Active management in this study was associated to greater incidences of hyperbilirubinemia, hypoglycemia and longer neonatal hospital stay. In the second article the incidence of neonatal sepsis was low and didn't decrease with induction of labor. It also didn't reduce the risk of other maternal nor neonatal outcomes. Finally, the third study concluded that induction of labor increased neonatal complications without reducing neonatal sepsis, but at the expense of increased frequency of intrapartum hemorrhage and maternal fever. CONCLUSION: After analyzing the selected articles, it is possible to conclude that there is enough evidence to say that expectant management is not inferior to active management in relation to PROM between 34 and 37 weeks of gestational age.

Early-onset neonatal sepsis and the implementation of group B streptococcus prophylaxis in a Brazilian maternity hospital: a descriptive study

Abstract Objectives: To describe early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) epidemiology in a public maternity hospital in Brasilia, Brazil. Methods: We defined EOS as a positive blood culture result obtained from infants aged ≤72 hours of life plus treatment with antibiotic therapy for ≥5 days. Incidence was calculated based on the number of cases and total live births (LB). This is a descriptive study comparing the period of 2012-2013 with the period of 2014-September 2015, before and after implementation of antibiotic prophylaxis during labor for group B streptococcus (GBS) prevention, respectively. Results: Overall, 36 infants developed EOS among 21,219 LB (1.7 cases per 1000 LB) and 16 died (case fatality rate of 44%). From 2014, 305 vaginal-rectal swabs were collected from high-risk women and 74 (24%) turned out positive for GBS. After implementation of GBS prevention guidelines, no new cases of GBS were detected, and the EOS incidence was reduced from 1.9 (95% CI 1.3-2.8) to 1.3 (95% CI 0.7-2.3) cases per 1000 LB from 2012-2013 to 2014-September 2015 (p = 0.32). Conclusions: Although the reduction of EOS incidence was not significant, GBS colonization among pregnant women was high, no cases of neonatal GBS have occurred after implementation of prevention guidelines.